Root Canal Treatment Versus Vital Pulp Therapy After Carious Exposure: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the United States Healthcare System

reportActive / Technical Report | Accesssion Number: AD1182670 | Open PDF

Abstract:

This cost-effectiveness analysis compared root canal therapy (RCT), direct pulp cap (DPC), partial pulpotomy (PP) and full pulpotomy (FP) in the U.S. healthcare system. Methods: A decision tree was constructed for a simulated adult patient with a permanent, mature, cariously exposed, asymptomatic tooth. Transition probabilities were obtained from previously published literature. National average costs for each treatment were obtained from published dental fees survey. A Monte Carlo simulation served for analysis of the CEA. Results: Monte Carlo simulation found cost-effectiveness ratio of7.19, 29.53, 37.02 and 41.32 for FP, DPC, RCT and PP respectively. Conclusions: Our study found FP to be significantly more cost-effective than NSRCT, DPC and FP. More research is needed in assessing and defining parameters for future CEAs in endodontics and dentistry in general.

Security Markings

DOCUMENT & CONTEXTUAL SUMMARY

Distribution Code:
A - Approved For Public Release
Distribution Statement: Public Release

RECORD

Collection: TRECMS
Subject Terms