U.S. Troops Stationed in South Korea, Anachronistic?

The stationing of U.S. military personnel in South Korea is viewed by many as a Cold War holdover that serves no contemporary purpose. Reasons given for ending the U.S. military presence in South Korea are that these forces are no longer needed to defend South Korea against North Korea, the cost of maintaining U.S. forces in South Korea is too high, the commitment of U.S. forces in Korea limits U.S. strategic flexibility, and rising South Korean anti-Americanism. This paper examines these concerns as well as the role that U.S. forces play in providing security on the Korean Peninsula and stability in the Asian-Pacific Region. It then examines three courses of action the United States could adopt while still fulfilling its commitment to the U.S.-ROK Mutual Defense Treaty. The conclusion is that the United States should maintain current force levels in South Korea. The continued unambiguous resolve and commitment of the United States to the stability of the Asia-Pacific region and its allies there remains a prudent, cost-effective constant. U.S. forces in South Korea are part of the strong U.S. ROK alliance and serve a vital purpose today -- their presence promotes stability and continued regional security. This not only benefits the United States but also the other nations of the region and the world.