The Widening Gap of Interoperability between US and Coalition/Allied Communications Systems: A Challenge for the Operational Commander.

Communications systems are very important, but often overlooked. As communications systems become more sophisticated, the problem is exacerbated by the inability of systems to work together, especially between the US and allied or coalition nations. As a definition, interoperability is the ability of the operational commander to use communications systems to exercise command, control and direction across the range of military operations. Unfortunately the widening gap in interoperability results in the inability of the operational commander to oversee and direct the forces under his command. If the US is determined to be a team player, then we need to make every effort to ensure that we can communicate and coordinate with the other members of our team. The US is not entirely at fault in this matter. Part of the problem is the inability of our alliedcoalition members to keep pace. There doesnt appear to be a current solution, but there are five possible courses of action to narroweliminate this gap the US could go it alone, provide coalition alliance members with the necessary communications systems, provide members with screened information, standardize all future coalitionallied acquisitions, or use coalitionallied forces in centralized but only low-tech situations. Unfortunately, all current efforts have their drawbacks for the benefits attained. Although there currently isnt a magic solution, now is the time to commit ourselves to the effort. Given the right framework, outlook, and commitment of resources, we can overcome it.