Preliminary and Critical Design Review Procedures and Effectiveness
Abstract:
This investigation examined the preparedness of Preliminary Design Review PDR and Critical Design Review CDR participants. Background and opinion data were gathered from junior and senior program managers and development engineers in order to assess their perception of PDR and CDR purposes, effectivenessefficiencies, training and guidance. The analysis was accomplished by sending a survey instrument to a sampling of program managers, and development engineers throughout the Air Force population within the borders of the U.S.A. The respondents tended to be in agreement with the PDRCDR purposes stated in Mil Std 1521B. The analysis revealed that most PDRCDRs are not as effective as these could be. The primary reason is the lack of knowledge on what should be accomplished by the participants. Most respondents claimed self teaching as the method of learning their preparation for PDRCDRs. Over 86. 2 percent of all respondents felt initial training would be useful and the majority indicated 6 to 12 months of acquisition.