A Comparison of an NPG-GMA and Two BIS-GMA Adhesive Resin Systems.

reportActive / Technical Report | Accession Number: ADA063018 | Open PDF

Abstract:

Based upon the assessment of data collected from the nineteen patients in this study 1 There was no statistically significant difference over nine months in the retention of the NPG-GMA or BIS-GMA resin systems to dentin 2 About 70 of the restorations were present at the end of nine months 3 The Nuva system, however, had the most favorable surface when viewed by the SEM 4 Adaptation of the adhesive resin to a rounded cervical defect was more difficult than for an angular lesion. Author

Author(s):
Hollinger, Jeffrey O. ; Moore, Edward M., Jr. ; Brady, John M. ; Mize, Stanley A.
Author Organization(s):
ARMY INST OF DENTAL RESEARCH WASHINGTON D C
Descriptive Note:
Rept. for Oct 77-Sep 78,
Pagination:
0038

Security Markings

DOCUMENT & CONTEXTUAL SUMMARY

Distribution:
Approved For Public Release

RECORD

Collection: TR
Subject Terms
Joint Capability Areas:
JCA_1.4_Force Support; JCA_1.4.1_Force Health Protection; JCA_1_Force Support; JCA_1.3_Human Capital Management; JCA_1.3.2_Personnel Management; JCA_5_Command and Control; JCA_3.2_Engagement; JCA_3_Force Application; JCA_1.2_Force Preparation; JCA_3.2.1_Kinetic Means
Communities of Interest:
No COI(s) Identified
Descriptor(s):
*EROSION, *ADHESIVES, *TEETH, *ABRASION, *DENTAL PROSTHESES, *DENTIN, ELECTRONIC SCANNERS, ACRYLIC RESINS, ELECTRON MICROSCOPY, RETENTION(GENERAL), METHACRYLATES, DENTISTRY, GLYCINE, CHELATE COMPOUNDS
Field(s)/Group(s):
Medicine and Medical Research
Keyword(s):
Cervical defects
Report Date:
1978 Dec 01