Accession Number:

ADA571192

Title:

Evaluation of JSAF EM Propagation Prediction Methods for Navy Continuous Training Environment/Fleet Synthetic Training Results and Recommendations: Part 1 - Evaluation of Current JSAF EM Propagation Modeling

Descriptive Note:

Technical rept. 1 Sep 2011-30 Sep 2012

Corporate Author:

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA

Report Date:

2012-12-01

Pagination or Media Count:

33.0

Abstract:

The EM propagation model currently used in JSAF is FFACTR which is a part of the Engineers Refractive Index Prediction System EREPS Tactical Decision Aid TDA developed by what is now SPAWARS SSC San Diego in 1988. This model is no longer supported by SPAWARS or any other group and has been replaced it is obsolete. This model is able to represent some realistic features including 1 decrease in signal strength increase in propagation loss with range, 2 more interference lobes for higher elevation and higher frequency transmitters, and 3 increased surface ranges for evaporation and surface ducts, and also with greater K-Factors. However the following deficiencies were noted 1. Duct Strength M value change had no effect on the JSAF predictions. 2. The JSAF interference lobes caused by interaction between direct and surface-reflected radiation did not have the correct spacing..3. The effects of surface ducts were not realistically modeled. In reality, ducts create complex signal strength patterns and at the surface typically show skip and hop bands of increased and decreased signal strength. The JSAF predictions were unrealistically smooth and showed no skip patterns. 4. The far range 30 km JSAF predictions appeared to have too strong signals and very simplified flat patterns. It appears that the JSAF EM model was not designed for these regions. 5. The standalone version used in this had no consideration for geographic location for predicting duct effects. Other versions do allow duct features to vary strongly over the Earth s surface. 6. The varying leakage of radiation above ducts was not captured by the JSAF predictions. 7. The radar hole that is usually present just above duct tops was not seen in the JSAF predictions. It is clear that there are considerable and significant weaknesses in the JSAF EM propagation prediction model which result in unrealistic range predictions, particularly in situations when ducting is present.

Subject Categories:

  • Computer Programming and Software
  • Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics
  • Radiofrequency Wave Propagation

Distribution Statement:

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE