Accession Number:

ADA551248

Title:

A Strait Comparison: Lessons Learned from the 1915 Dardanelles Campaign in the Context of a Strait of Hormuz Closure Event

Descriptive Note:

Final rept.

Corporate Author:

CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES ALEXANDRIA VA

Personal Author(s):

• Schroden, Jonathan

Report Date:

2011-09-01

Pagination or Media Count:

66.0

Abstract:

In 1915, the Allies attempted to force open the Dardanelles Straits in the face of an integrated Turkish and German defense sea mines plus covering fire, using first their navy and then their army, with disastrous results. An analysis of the navy portion of this campaign identified a number of lessons at the strategic and operational levels pertaining specifically to risk assessments, strategic communications, proper strategic and operational planning, operational leadership, and operational art. These lessons were juxtaposed with a modern attempt by a belligerent such as Iran to close the Strait of Hormuz, yielding a number of points to consider when thinking through the implications of a Strait of Hormuz closure as well as corresponding recommendations for U.S. policymakers, strategists, and planners.

Descriptors:

• *FIRST WORLD WAR
• *LESSONS LEARNED
• COMPARISON
• HISTORY
• HORMUZ STRAIT
• IRAN
• MILITARY ART
• MILITARY PLANNING
• MINE CLEARANCE
• NAVAL MINES

Subject Categories:

• Humanities and History
• Naval Surface Warfare

Distribution Statement:

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE