Give Peace a Chance: First, Try Coercive Diplomacy
NAVAL WAR COLL NEWPORT RI
Pagination or Media Count:
The first section below addresses the strategic objectives of the United States concerning Iraq and identifies a number of specific reasons why Washington cannot indefinitely accept the status quo. The argument then turns to why coercive diplomacy should be the principal means for pursuing American strategic priorities in Iraq, laying out the case for postponing unilateral use of force and assessing coercive diplomacys strengths and weaknesses as a tool for accomplishing U.S. objectives. The third section tackles the central issue-can Saddams regime be coerced-by studying several cases in which the United States used coercive diplomacy against Iraq during the 1990s. The fourth section derives a framework that might make success possible or, failing that, from which Iraq would derive no significant benefits should coercive diplomacy fail and war become a necessity.
- Government and Political Science
- Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics