Joint Doctrine for Unmanned Aircraft Systems: The Air Force and the Army Hold the Key to Success
NAVAL WAR COLL NEWPORT RI JOINT MILITARY OPERATIONS DEPT
Pagination or Media Count:
Unmanned aircraft systems UAS have experienced explosive demand in Iraq and Afghanistan in the past few years due to their ability to provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance ISR over vast theaters of operations. This paper examines the differences between the Air Forces and Armys approach at meeting the demand for effective and efficient UAS operations. The first difference between the services is command and control C2, with the analysis focusing on centralized versus decentralized C2. The second difference concerns operations locations and examines the benefits of remote operations over in-theater operations. The final difference is in UAS operators the Air Force has historically insisted on pilots and officers, while the Army leaves UAS operations in the hands of its very capable non-commissioned officers. Each of these differences will be examined with respect to the current focus on counterinsurgency COIN operations. This paper concludes with recommendations for incorporating aspects of each services practices and doctrine into joint doctrine that will remain flexible across the range of military operations.
- Military Aircraft Operations
- Administration and Management
- Military Forces and Organizations