Covert Action: Legislative Background and Possible Policy Questions
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON DC CONGRESSIONAL RESEARCH SERVICE
Pagination or Media Count:
Published reports have suggested that in the wake of the 911 terrorist attacks, the Pentagon has expanded its counter-terrorism intelligence activities as part of what the Bush Administration termed the global war on terror. Some observers have asserted that the Department of Defense DOD may have been conducting certain kinds of counterterrorism intelligence activities that would statutorily qualify as covert actions, and thus require a presidential finding and the notification of the congressional intelligence committees. Defense officials have asserted that none of DODs current counter-terrorist intelligence activities constitute covert action as defined under the law, and therefore, do not require a presidential finding and the notification of the intelligence committees. Rather, they contend that DOD conducts only clandestine activities. Although the term is not defined by statute, these officials characterize such activities as constituting actions that are conducted in secret, but which constitute passive intelligence information gathering. By comparison, covert action, they contend, is active, in that its aim is to elicit change in the political, economic, military, or diplomatic behavior of a target.
- Government and Political Science
- Sociology and Law
- Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics