Biting Deterrent Activity of a Deet Analog, Two DEPA Analogs, and SS220 Applied Topically to Human Volunteers Compared with Deet Against Three Species of Blood-Feeding Flies
WALTER REED ARMY INST OF RESEARCH SILVER SPRING MD DEPT OF ENTOMOLOGY
Pagination or Media Count:
An earlier in vitro screening of N,N-diethyl-3-methylbenzamide Deet and N,Ndiethylphenylacetamide DEPA analogs showed that two DEPA analogs, N,N-diethyl3-bromophenyl acetamide and N,N-diethyl,,-tri uoro-m-tolylacetamide, and one Deet analog, N,N,- diethyl3-tri uoromethylbenzamide, had biting-deterrent activities that were superior to Deet against Aedes aegypti L. and Anopheles stephensi Liston. In the current study, the three analogs and 1S,2S-methylpiperidinyl-3-cyclohexene-1-carboxamide SS220 were applied topically to the skin of human volunteers at 24 nmol compoundcm2 skin and compared with the activity of Deet at the same dose against biting by Ae. aegypti, An. stephensi, and Phlebotomus papatasi Scopoli females. SS220 proved to be as effective as Deet against Ae. aegypti and P. papatasi but more effective than Deet against An. stephensi. Contrary to the earlier in vitro tests, results with humans in vivo testing showed that neither of the DEPA analogs nor the Deet analog performed more effectively than Deet against the insects. The in vivo results showed that the analogs were not suf ciently effective to warrant further development. Notably, in vivo and in vitro methods used in discovery of personal protection chemicals for human use against blood-feeding flies can both be effective discriminating tools, but results obtained with the respective methods may not always agree. Ultimately,we surmise that in vivo testing methods with humans must be used to discriminate among compounds that superficially seem effective when screened using an in vitro method.
- Medicine and Medical Research