Accession Number:

ADA460012

Title:

Session 4: LCCA, Measuring and Verification. Cost Effective M&V for the Department of Defense

Descriptive Note:

Conference paper

Corporate Author:

TEXAS A AND M UNIV COLLEGE STATION

Report Date:

2003-10-07

Pagination or Media Count:

30.0

Abstract:

MV History 1 In the past, most USAF ESCO contracts were stipulated. This means that the USAF installation agreed that the savings were met for the 20 year contract at the time of contract signing. The USAF then assumed all risk for achieving savings. Finding many problems with accuracy of guarantees. If savings were not met, no budget existed to make up short-fall. 2 Projects in the DoD today are often stipulated. MV Strategies 1 Standard MV methods being introduced to accelerate ESCO growth in USAF. Less review required. Faster turnaround and approval. Targeted for the 80 solution. 2 Growing pains being experienced as the USAF and ESCOs implement monitoring. MV cost target 5 of the savings. Saves USAF from experiencing 30 drop in savings.

Subject Categories:

  • Economics and Cost Analysis
  • Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies

Distribution Statement:

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE