Accession Number:

ADA235551

Title:

A Comparison of Manual Scaled and Predicted foE and foF1 Critical Frequencies

Descriptive Note:

Technical rept. no. 2

Corporate Author:

LOWELL UNIV MA CENTER FOR ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH

Report Date:

1990-07-01

Pagination or Media Count:

56.0

Abstract:

The CCIR and Titheridge for critical frequency prediction routines were tested by comparison with 1875 manually scaled values. The foF1 critical frequency prediction routine of Millman et al was tested by comparison with 1005 manually scaled values. Plots and statistics of the comparisons are presented and discussed. From the results recommendations are made to help improve autoscaling.

Subject Categories:

  • Atmospheric Physics
  • Statistics and Probability

Distribution Statement:

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE