Accession Number : ADA590649


Title :   A Comparative Assessment of the Navy's Future Naval Capabilities (FNC) Process and Joint Staff Capability Gap Assessment Process as Related to Pacific Command's Integrated Priority List Submission


Descriptive Note : Technical rept.


Corporate Author : ANSER ARLINGTON VA


Personal Author(s) : Frittman, Jaime ; McGee, Sibel ; Yuhas, John


Full Text : https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a590649.pdf


Report Date : 13 Dec 2012


Pagination or Media Count : 56


Abstract : This study sought to address whether acquisition is responsive to Combatant Command (COCOM) needs by comparing a responsive system (the Navy's Future Naval Capabilities [FNC] process) to the Joint Staff (JS)/COCOM process, using Pacific Command (PACOM) as an example. Recognizing different end-states ascribed to both processes, we compared the two processes in terms of gap identification and development--common to both. We concluded that while the JS/PACOM system attempts to be responsive, current practices (e.g., informal tracking mechanisms) prevent an authoritative evaluation of responsiveness. We provided key insights into FNC practices that enhance responsiveness and offered recommendations for improving the JS/PACOM process.


Descriptors :   *MILITARY CAPABILITIES , MILITARY FORCES(UNITED STATES) , MILITARY PROCUREMENT , NAVY


Subject Categories : Military Forces and Organizations
      Logistics, Military Facilities and Supplies
      Military Operations, Strategy and Tactics


Distribution Statement : APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE