Accession Number : AD1016100


Title :   How Big Should the Army Be Considerations for Congress


Descriptive Note : Technical Report


Corporate Author : Congressional Research Service Washington United States


Personal Author(s) : Kapp,Lawrence ; Feickert,Andrew ; McInnis,Kathleen J ; Williams,Lynn M


Full Text : https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/1016100.pdf


Report Date : 02 Sep 2016


Pagination or Media Count : 20


Abstract : Article I, Section 8, of the U.S. Constitution vests Congress with broad powers over the armed forces, including the power To raise and support Armies and To provide and maintain a Navy. As such, the size of the armed forces is a topic of perennial congressional interest and debate. Congress annually sets minimum and maximum strength levels for the active components and maximum strength levels for the reserve components. The House and Senate versions of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY2017 authorized differing levels for active duty personnel in each of the services, but these authorizations diverge most significantly with respect to the Army. The Senate version of the FY2017 National Defense Authorization Act approved Army end strength of 460,000 soldiers, while the House version approved an Army end strength of 480,000. The Senate figure represents a decrease of 15,000 soldiers in comparison to the Armys FY2016 end strength of 475,000, while the House figure represents an increase of 5,000.


Descriptors :   army personnel , active duty , department of defense , personnel management , national security , warfare , counterterrorism , manpower , policies , congress , military strategy


Distribution Statement : APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE